Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 Review
I’m that 5G guy. I’ve actually been here for every “G.” I’ve reviewed well over a thousand products during 18 years working full-time at PCMag.com, including every generation of the iPhone and the Samsung Galaxy S. I also write a weekly newsletter, Fully Mobilized, where I obsess about phones and networks.
The Bottom Line
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 4 feels as premium as ever, and its all-important-yet-diminutive front screen keeps you focused on the world around you.
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 Specs
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 12 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Dimensions | 3.34 x 2.83 x 0.67 inches |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 2,640 by 1,080 pixels |
| Camera Resolution (Rear; Front-Facing) | 12MP, 12MP; 10MP |
| Battery Life (As Tested) | 11 hours 27 minutes |
The third time was the charm for Samsung’s big-screen Galaxy Z Fold (and the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is even better), but the smaller, more popular Flip needed one more generation of development. The new Z Flip 4 ($999.99) overcomes the battery issues of its predecessor and is still as intriguing as ever. Samsung’s mobile exec TM Roh keeps saying he wants foldables to be mainstream, and the Z Flip 4 is as close to that ideal as any yet; I’ve seen this phone at airports, on the subway, and even at a public bus stop outside a housing project in Queens. Yes, you’re still paying a premium for the flippable form, but, if you like how the design keeps you focused on life off-screen, no other phone in the US offers quite the same experience.
A Very Touchable Phone
When it is closed, the Galaxy Z Flip 4 measures 3.34 by 2.83 by 0.67 inches (HWD). A new, flatter hinge design makes it slightly smaller and more pocketable than the Galaxy Z Flip 3 (3.38 by 2.83 by 0.67 inches, 6.45 ounces). The new model is a little heavier than the previous one at 6.6 ounces, but I didn’t notice any practical weight difference, and the phone still feels sufficiently light to me.
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. See how we test. (Opens in a new window)
The Flip 4 is available in four standard colors: Graphite, Pink Gold, Bora Purple, and Blue. Alternatively, you can also order a bespoke model with custom front and back-panel color combinations. For instance, you can add yellow, navy, red, khaki, or white elements into the mix for a total of 75 possible combinations. The bespoke model costs $40 more. Home buyers may sell your property quickly and easily. They will handle all selling formalities, freeing sellers of any concern. Visit https://www.cashhomebuyers.io/new-mexico/.
The front and back covers, which use Gorilla Glass Victus+, are particularly soft and smooth. It’s soothing to glide my fingers across the device, and I enjoy having something to fidget with while testing the phone. As for durability, the handset features an IPX8 rating, which means it’s fully water-resistant, but not dustproof. Other flagship phones, such as the Apple iPhone 13 and the Google Pixel 6, are fully dust- and water-resistant, but, then again, they don’t feature a folding design.
Similar Products
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Google Pixel 7
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 6a
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4
Motorola Moto G Power (2022)
Motorola Moto G Pure
OnePlus 10T
OnePlus Nord N20
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Like on the Fold 4, the right side of the Flip 4 includes a power button and a volume rocker. The home button integrates a physical fingerprint sensor; it works quickly and accurately. A USB-C connector sits on the bottom, but you notably don’t get a headphone jack here.
One thing you can’t do with the Flip 4 is clack it open and closed one-handed, like with a classic flip phone of the aughts. The hinge is primed to stay stable at any angle, so you can lever the phone open with your thumb a bit, but the best method for unfurling the device is to hold the bottom half in one hand and smoothly open the other half with your other.
Open the phone fully to reveal the very tall 6.7-inch, 120Hz OLED panel with a 2,640-by-1,080-pixel resolution. The screen has an awkward 22:9 aspect ratio. For reference, most recent mainstream Galaxy S models sit somewhere between 19:9 and 20:9, so the Flip 4 is proportionally narrower. The screen is great for scrollable content like social media https://jiji.ng/ and webpages, but not ideal for playing games in landscape mode.
Samsung says the main screen glass is 45% stronger than that of the previous model. The folding crease is visible, but not really noticeable if you are looking at anything on the screen straight-on. Like the Galaxy Z Fold 4, a super-bright daylight mode ensures that the Flip’s screen remains usable outdoors.
Front and Centered
The key to the Flip 4 experience is its 1.9-inch front display with a resolution of 512 by 250 pixels; the specs haven’t changed from the Flip 3, but new software features help encourage you to open the phone less often.
The three software highlights are message replies, the calendar widget, and Samsung Wallet. Like on a Galaxy Watch 5, you can now check your messages and deliver prewritten or audio replies directly from the front screen. The ability to check your calendar from the outside of the phone also kept me from flipping open the device quite as often.
Paying for things without opening your phone is another big advantage, but I’m a little confused as to why Samsung insists that you can add a driver’s license, car key, vaccination card, or student ID in Samsung Wallet because the app doesn’t yet support many services. Samsung Wallet accepted my vaccination card, but I couldn’t add my driver’s license yet; the car key integration is restricted to a small number of Hyundai and Kia models; and the only boarding passes it accepts are from Korean Air. Samsung needs to expand compatibility before it touts this feature.
Samsung also keeps emphasizing the device’s Flex mode; you can enable this by folding the phone halfway into an L-shape. We like that the stance gives you a really stable platform for photos and that the phone conveniently kicks YouTube videos and such onto the top half of the phone. By double-tapping the power button, you can also use the front screen as a viewfinder to take selfies in this orientation.
Staying Alive
The biggest concern with the Z Flip 3 was poor battery life; its 3,300mAh battery only ran for about half a day in our experience. But I have good news: The Flip 4’s 3,700mAh battery performs much better. It lasts longer on our video streaming battery rundown test (11 hours, 30 minutes compared with nine hours, 30 minutes). Plus, I estimate that the phone can run for between 22 and 26 hours per charge under normal usage. Just remember to charge the phone every night and you should be perfectly fine.
On the downside, the Flip 4, like the Fold 4, charges irritatingly slowly. Samsung claims a charging rate of 25W but, in testing, a McDodo cable showed a rate of only 15W (and declining over time) after we reached a 50% charge. This throttling is due to Samsung’s concern about battery health, but it also means the phone takes nearly two hours to fully charge. That’s cold comfort when you’re about to head out to the club and realize you’re at 26%. Competing slate-style phones, such as the OnePlus 10T, can fully charge in mere minutes.
The phone also supports 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse charging. And yes, you can charge the Flip 4 while it is folded. Check out our more in-depth story about Flip and Fold battery testing here for further details.
Some Performance Compromises
The Flip 4 runs Android 12 on top of the new Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset. Samsung says the device will get four years of Android feature updates and five years of security updates. We can’t stress enough that that’s the best in the business right now. The phone comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB of non-expandable storage.
Despite the Flip 4’s flagship specs, it offers closer to midrange performance in testing. But, that’s fine! Remember, this is a phone you are supposed to use less. Samsung opted for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset with the advanced X65 modem not for its extreme power, which is put to better use on the Asus ROG Phone 6 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, but for its extreme power efficiency. This choice pays off in our signal strength tests and, as mentioned, our battery rundown test.
Samsung throttles the chipset severely when it’s under load—more than I’ve seen on any other phone. Using the CPU Throttling Test app, I slammed the Flip’s processor for 15 minutes and found that performance fell to about the level of the Galaxy S21. That’s also fine! We also evaluated how well the phone ran Genshin Impact using the PerfDog software and averaged between 41fps and 42fps. That’s much lower than the results we got with the Fold 4 (48.6fps) and OnePlus 10T (57fps) but, again, this isn’t a gaming phone. We have a longer story about Galaxy Flip and Fold performance benchmarks that you should also check out.
Cell quality and cell signal results are pretty much the same as with the Galaxy Z Fold 4, which is to say excellent. The key player here is (again) Qualcomm’s X65 modem, which, as we saw on the Galaxy S22 devices, significantly improves cellular performance in low-signal areas and improves the speed of recovery from dead zones. Like the Fold 4, the Flip 4 supports all of the current 5G bands from the three major US wireless providers, including millimeter-wave and AT&T’s 3.54GHz mid-band. The device has one nano SIM slot with an additional eSIM option. For the full test results, read our story about Galaxy Flip and Fold signal testing.
The phone supports Wi-Fi 6, but not 6E. That’s not a big deal, though, because very few Wi-Fi 6E routers exist. All the usual other standards—GPS, NFC, and Bluetooth 5.2—are here as well. The Flip doesn’t offer the same ultra-wideband positioning system as the Fold 4, but that feature isn’t overly important. For Bluetooth audio, the special Samsung seamless Bluetooth codec enables hi-res, 24-bit audio in combination with Samsung earbuds like the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro.
I didn’t find multimedia playback nearly as compelling here as on the Fold 4. Specifically, the Flip’s single, bottom-firing speaker produces much tinnier sound, and the earpiece doesn’t contribute enough volume to provide a real stereo experience. We recommend you use wireless headphones instead.
Camera Trade-Offs
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 sticks with a 12MP main camera and a 12MP ultra-wide sensor. It lacks the S22+’s 3x zoom lens, which means any photos you zoom in on will be a bit soft.
The cameras here are good, though you can pick out areas where the Z Fold 4 and Galaxy S22+ are better if you look closely. For instance, the edges of ultra-wide shots on the Z Flip 4 show a bit more distortion. Additionally, some night mode shots have a bit less depth of field.
It can be hard to tell the difference between shots from the Galaxy Flip (left), Fold (center), and S22+ (right) (Credit: Sascha Segan)
One particular area of concern is the quality of low-light photos from the front-facing camera; they aren’t quite as sharp or well-balanced as those from the Fold and S22+. Selfies from the main camera are distinctly better, so you should take your selfies with the Flip closed.
The selfie camera (left) takes dull shots compared with the main camera (right) (Credit: Sascha Segan)
We have a more in-depth comparison of the Flip, Fold, and Galaxy S22+ cameras if you want to read more about the differences.
The Mainstream Foldable
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 is a fun, flirty phone that encourages you to slip it into a pocket and just live your life. In a lot of ways, it’s the opposite of Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 4 ($1,799.99), which demands your attention as a capable, multitasking machine.
You pay a premium for the innovative folding design, as well as give up some gaming power and image quality compared with the more typical S22+ ($999.99), but no other smartphone offers quite the same moderating experience or portability. The new Motorola Razr seems like a worthy alternative, but we need to wait for that phone to arrive stateside. And Apple is about to stop producing the very pocketable iPhone 13 mini ($699.99). That leaves the Flip 4 in a unique market position and earns it our strong recommendation, even though the Fold 4 gets the Editors’ Choice nod between the two.
Motorola Moto G Pure Review
The Moto G Pure offers Android phone buyers a bright display, good battery life, and solid performance for less than $200.
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Motorola Moto G Pure Specs
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 11 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G25 |
| Dimensions | 6.6 by 3.0 by 0.3 inches |
| Screen Size | 6.5 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 1,600 by 720 pixels |
| Camera Resolution (Rear; Front-Facing) | 13MP, 2MP; 5MP |
| Battery Life (As Tested) | 12 hours, 9 minutes |
Motorola’s prolific release schedule over the past few years has been punctuated by highs and lows. With a few notable exceptions, such as the high-end Razr 5G, the company’s best phones tend to be its least expensive, and the $159.99 Moto G Pure is no exception. What sets the Moto G Pure apart from other affordable phones is its simplicity: Motorola focuses on getting the basics right here, and it does. With a vivid display, strong battery life, and solid performance for the price, the Moto G Pure is one of the best budget-friendly phones we’ve tested this year.
A Simple, Straightforward Design
The Moto G Pure sports an understated and utilitarian design. It has a textured blue back panel that feels nice to the touch and doesn’t easily scratch or accumulate smudges. The phone measures 6.6 by 3.0 by 0.3 inches (HWD) and weighs 6.6 ounces; it’s well balanced and easy to hold in one hand.
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. See how we test. (Opens in a new window)
A 6.5-inch, 1,600-by-720 pixel LCD is interrupted by a teardrop notch at the top for the selfie camera, with a prominent bezel at the bottom. The display is bright and crisp, with excellent color accuracy, but you’ll notice some pixelation because of its relatively low resolution. That said, unless you’re really holding the screen right up to your face and looking at it closely, it’s totally fine. Viewing angles are good, but a lack of antireflective coating means its best to look at the display head on.
The top of the phone is home to a headphone jack and a microphone, while a speaker, USB-C charging port, and second microphone sit on the bottom edge. There’s a SIM/microSD slot on the left, while a volume rocker and textured power button are on the right. The buttons are tiny, but easy to recognize by touch and have a satisfying click.
Similar Products
Motorola Moto e
Motorola Moto G Play (2021)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Google Pixel 5a With 5G
OnePlus Nord N100
On the back of the phone, a slim camera stack sits in the upper left corner. A fingerprint sensor with Motorola’s logo is centered on the back as well; it’s fast, accurate, and easy to reach even with small hands.
The display is made of strengthened glass and should resist scratches and minor dings without issue. The G Pure’s durable plastic body and chassis should withstand the rigors of everyday life, too. And while the handset doesn’t have an IP rating (which isn’t common in this price range), it’s resistant to splashes.
Fast LTE, Crisp Calls, Okay Speaker
The Moto G Pure is available unlocked and through many carriers. The unlocked version works on every major US carrier and has broad LTE support. If you purchase the phone from a carrier, it may be locked or lack complete band support for other networks.
We tested the G Pure on Verizon’s LTE network and recorded impressive results, with average speeds of 97.7Mbps down and 57.6Mbps up. It doesn’t have 5G, however. If 5G is important to you, and you aren’t concerned with super-fast mmWave speeds, the $279.99 Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a better bet.
Call quality is solid. Maximum earpiece volume clocks in at 85dB, which is loud enough to carry out a conversation on a busy street. Test calls were clear, and noise cancellation worked well even despite some heavy winds.
Dual-band Wi-Fi is onboard, as is Bluetooth 5.0 for audio and wearable connectivity. NFC is missing, but it isn’t expected at this price.
Simply put, the bottom-firing speaker is fine for calls and scrolling through TikTok, but you’ll probably want to use a pair of headphones for listening to your Spotify playlist. Volume tops out at 88dB and is loud enough to fill a room, but it isn’t particularly impressive.
No Bloated Camera Stack Here
The Moto G Pure has a 13MP primary camera sensor with an f/2.2 aperture, along with a 2MP depth lens for portrait mode and bokeh. The phone’s front-facing camera uses a 5MP sensor.
The rear camera’s performance is admirable in good light. Test shots show excellent depth of field and color accuracy. Backgrounds are a little soft, but you likely won’t notice unless you examine photos at full size. Portrait mode struggles with fine details such as shoulder outlines and wisps of hair.
Low-light performance with the rear sensor is decent, but depth of field is slightly shallow and colors are muted. Noise correction is also overly aggressive; it renders background detail mushy and blurs details around eyeglasses and other small objects in the foreground.
In good light, the front-facing camera produces solid images. Color accuracy is spot-on and foreground detail is crisp. That said, depth of field is shallow and it struggles to maintain some fine details. Unsurprisingly, the selfie camera struggles in low light. Photos are flat and fuzzy, with prominent orbs and artifacts.
Ultimately, the cameras are what you’d expect at this price; they’re not incredible, but they work fine for social media shares. If you’re a smartphone shutterbug who wants to take great shots in just about any lighting scenario, you’ll have to pay a lot more for a phone like the $449 Google Pixel 5a With 5G.
Excels at Basic Tasks
A MediaTek Hello 625 chipset and 3GB of RAM power the Moto G Pure. It only has 32GB of storage, 21GB of which is available out of the box. You can add up to an additional 512GB of storage via the microSD card slot.
The phone takes solid photos with excellent depth of field and color accuracy in good light (Photo: Steven Winkelman)
Performance is excellent for an entry-level phone. The G Pure excels with basic multitasking, though I noticed a little lag when opening apps and swiping between screens. Caching is also present when multiple browser tabs are open, but these quibbles aren’t deal breakers by any means.
That said, the G Pure isn’t a gaming phone. If you’re just playing Candy Crush or Words With Friends on your morning commute, that’s fine. But if you want to play PUBG: Mobile or Genshin Impact, this isn’t the phone for you.
On Geekbench, a benchmark that quantifies raw performance, the G Pure scored 133 single-core (SC) and 489 multi-core (MC). For comparison, the $169.99 Moto G Play turned in 255 SC and 1,269 MC, while the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G managed 501 SC and 1,678 MC. That said, benchmarks aren’t always an accurate indicator of how a phone will perform for everyday tasks. We found the G Pure to feel snappier overall when compared with the G Play.
The G Pure has a 4,000mAh battery. In our battery drain test, which streams HD video over Wi-Fi, it lasted 12 hours and 9 minutes, which should be enough to get most people through the day without a problem. It certainly doesn’t compare with the Moto G Play (18 hours, 42 minutes) or even the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (13 hours, 1 minute), but it’s still a respectable result. If you do find your battery creeping into the red zone, be prepared to hang out while you top off the phone, as the G Pure doesn’t support fast charging.
Android 11 With a Few Tweaks
The Moto G Pure runs Android 11, along with Motorola’s updated My UX interface. Motorola uses a light hand for its software overlay, adding gestures and customization features to what is essentially stock Android.
Moto Actions is one of My UX’s best features, allowing you to use quick gestures for some common tasks. For example, you can flick your wrist twice while holding the phone to turn on the flashlight, or tap the display with three fingers to take a screenshot.
The G Pure will receive two years of regular security patches, and eventually get an upgrade to Android 12. That time frame isn’t as generous as the two-to-three-year upgrade policy you get with most of Samsung’s A-series phones, but it’s fine for the price.
A First-Rate Entry-Level Phone
Solid performance, good battery life, a bright display, and a durable build make the Moto G Pure one of the better entry-level phones on the market. That said, Motorola has mastered the sub-$200 phone, and you have several choices in this price range with slightly different specs and features, so it’s important to pick the one that suits you best. For Android 12, USB-C charging, and a big display, the $159.99 Moto G Pure is the way to go. If you want the best battery life, the $169.99 Moto G Play has the edge. And if you’re simply looking for the most affordable option, we recommend the $149.99 Moto e, our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable phones. On the flip side, if you’re willing to look beyond Motorola and spend a bit more, the $279.99 Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a worthwhile upgrade that offers 5G connectivity, faster hardware, a more generous upgrade policy, and better cameras, earning it our Editors’ Choice award for a slightly higher price bracket.